US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,129
Stone v. Underwood
as 1:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Jackie Wayne Stone
Respondent:
Doc Jamie Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Mazza
as 5:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Robinson
Respondent:
Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nix v. Mazza
as 3:2022cv00407
Petitioner:
Shelby Joe Nix
Defendant:
Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00095
Petitioner:
Jeffery Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Ferguson
as 3:2022cv00400
Petitioner:
Samuel Patton
Respondent:
Jessie Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gabbard v. Green
as 4:2022cv00091
Petitioner:
Grover Clifton Gabbard
Respondent:
Warden David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stepp v. Mazza
as 3:2022cv00368
Petitioner:
Chad Aaron Stepp
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larrabee v. Gilley
as 1:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
Jonathan Wayne Larrabee
Respondent:
Warden J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores v. Unknown Defendant
as 3:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Ramon F. Flores
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant and Lamine N'Diaye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flintroy v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00347
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dion Flintroy, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
