US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,482
Williams v. Krow
as 3:2024cv00635
Petitioner:
Jordan Williams
Respondent:
Ivan Krow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyer v. Massamore et al
as 4:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Cheri Riddle, Cirris Hatfield, David Massamore and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Paul Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Schaad et al
as 3:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
James Moore
Defendant:
Robert Schaad, Jan Brightwell and Judith McDonald-Burkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. United States Marshalls et al
as 4:2024cv00113
Defendant:
Owensboro Police Department, Owensboro Mercy Health and United States Marshalls
Plaintiff:
Justin Shane Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. USA
as 3:2024cv00620
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ward Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. Erickson et al
as 5:2024cv00164
Defendant:
Rick Erickson, Adam Smith and Lieutenant Bryan Rives
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. USA
as 3:2024cv00614
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wright
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stiff v. Straman et al
as 3:2024cv00609
Defendant:
Christopher Marks, Noah Straman, Joshua Arnwine and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Andrew Stiff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. McKenzie
as 5:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
James Carr Potter, II
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grigsby v. USA
as 3:2024cv00603
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Grigsby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
