US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,697
Duke v. USA
as 4:2023cv11538
Petitioner:
Ronnie Edward Duke
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Welch v. USA
as 1:2023cv11519
Petitioner:
Koryion Deshawn Welch
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Drozdowski v. USA
as 2:2023cv11415
Petitioner:
David Randy Drozdowski
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Castano v. USA
as 2:2023cv11377
Petitioner:
Victor Carlos Castano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Castano v. USA
as 2:2023cv11378
Petitioner:
Victor Carlos Castano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. USA
as 2:2023cv11352
Petitioner:
Jeff Garvin Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cox v. USA
as 2:2023cv11288
Petitioner:
Antoine Devon Cox
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rich v. USA
as 2:2023cv11285
Petitioner:
Michael Kenneth Rich
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ciesielski v. USA
as 1:2023cv11216
Petitioner:
Christopher Ciesielski
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McGlory v. USA
as 4:2023cv11151
Petitioner:
Vincent Troy McGlory
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
