Ohio Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 1,243
Mellaconic IP LLC v. Kourt Security Partners LLC
as 1:2021cv00697
Defendant:
Kourt Security Partners LLC doing business as Select Security
Plaintiff:
Mellaconic IP LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Gridley IP LLC v. Instacart LLC
as 1:2021cv00213
Defendant:
Instacart LLC
Plaintiff:
Gridley IP LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Mellaconic IP LLC v. Vector Security, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Mellaconic IP LLC
Defendant:
Vector Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Mellaconic IP LLC v. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc.
as 2:2021cv01393
Defendant:
Constellation NewEnergy, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mellaconic IP LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Harmony Licensing LLC v. Zebra Technologies Corporation
as 1:2021cv00210
Defendant:
Zebra Technologies Corporation
Plaintiff:
Harmony Licensing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Harmony Licensing LLC v. Advantech Corporation
as 1:2021cv00209
Defendant:
Advantech Corporation
Plaintiff:
Harmony Licensing LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
D&L Properties South, Inc. v. Berk Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00619
Plaintiff:
D&L Properties South, Inc.
Defendant:
M.H. Enterprises International, Inc. other d/b/a Teriyaki Madness, Berk Enterprises, Inc. and M.H. Enterprises International, Inc. doing business as Teriyaki Madness
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Noco Company v. CF Group SZKMS Co., Ltd
as 1:2021cv00604
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Defendant:
CF Group SZKMS Co., Ltd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Canon Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
as 3:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Canon Inc.
Defendant:
Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Canon Inc. v. Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Canon Inc.
Defendant:
Ink Technologies Printer Supplies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
