Ohio Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 938
Ward v. City of Columbus
as 2:2023cv03862
Plaintiff:
Leigh Anne Ward and Leigh A Ward
Defendant:
City of Columbus
Hill v. Wadsworth & Associates, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02219
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Hill and MJ
Defendant:
Wadsworth & Associates, Inc. doing business as Wadsworth Solutions
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
United States of America v. Mullet Roofing, LLC
as 1:2023cv02188
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mullet Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Hart v. The General Electric Company
as 1:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Robert Hart
Defendant:
The General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
United States of America v. Johns Roofing, LTD
as 1:2023cv01948
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Johns Roofing, LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Willcutt v. AAA Club Alliance Inc.
as 3:2023cv01906
Plaintiff:
Devin Willcutt
Defendant:
AAA Club Alliance Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
United States v. Mullets Construction, LLC
as 1:2023cv01844
Plaintiff:
United States and United States of America
Defendant:
Mullets Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Booker v. Republic Steel
as 5:2023cv01771
Plaintiff:
Terry Booker
Defendant:
Republic Steel, Corp. and Republic Steel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
United States of America v. A1 Tree Removal & Roofing, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
A1 Tree Removal & Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Bahensky v. Condado Tacos
as 2:2023cv02694
Plaintiff:
Liliana Bahensky
Defendant:
Condado Tacos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
