US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,570
Taylor v. Hall et al
as 3:2022cv00616
Petitioner:
Corey Taylor
Respondent:
Daron Hall, Davidson County Government and Glenn Funk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Breedlove v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Dionte L. Breedlove
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Silas v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00584
Petitioner:
Tammy Renee Silas
Respondent:
f/n/u Smith and Carswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sontay v. Rose
as 3:2022cv00552
Petitioner:
Marlon Sontay
Defendant:
Sharon Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Perry
as 3:2022cv00550
Petitioner:
Jerome Perkins
Respondent:
f/n/u Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Keasling v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00529
Petitioner:
John Michael Keasling
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
King v. West Tennessee State Prison
as 3:2022cv00492
Petitioner:
William Carter King
Respondent:
West Tennessee State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Frink
as 3:2022cv00461
Petitioner:
Antonio Smith
Respondent:
Warden Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00440
Petitioner:
Joshua A. Woods
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Harris v. Boyd
as 3:2022cv00443
Petitioner:
Ronald David Harris
Respondent:
Bert Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
