Tennessee Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 866
Livingston v. Jay Livingston Music, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Tammy Livingston
Defendant:
Jay Livingston Music, Inc. and Travilyn Livingston
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Stokes v. Pumping Station LLC
as 2:2022cv02412
Plaintiff:
Michael Stokes
Defendant:
Pumping Station LLC doing business as The Pumping Station Memphis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. 3rd Home Limited Co.
as 3:2022cv00478
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
3rd Home Limited Co.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Goldmine and Coco LLC v. Taylor
as 2:2022cv02400
Plaintiff:
Goldmine and Coco LLC
Defendant:
Turkessa Taylor
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Garner v. Daywind Records, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00454
Defendant:
Daywind Records, Inc., Christian Taylor Music, Inc., Guardians Quartet, Inc., The and others
Plaintiff:
Norris Garner
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Arbour v. Upchurch et al
as 3:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Nicole Arbour
Defendant:
Ryan Upchurch, Thomas Toner, Holler Boy Records, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
