Tennessee Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 464
Orange et al v. Rotary Corporation
as 3:2016cv00834
Plaintiff:
Charles Orange , Steve Eller , Batlock, LLC and others
Defendant:
Rotary Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101
Dalen Products, Inc v. Good Life, Inc. (PLR2)
as 3:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Dalen Products, Inc
Defendant:
Good Life, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
WCM Industries, Inc. v. The Keeney Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2016cv02139
Plaintiff:
WCM Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
The Keeney Manufacturing Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
WCM Industries, Inc. v. The Keeney Manufacturing Company
as 2:2016cv02138
Plaintiff:
WCM Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
The Keeney Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
WCM Industries, Inc. v. The Keeney Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2016cv02118
Plaintiff:
WCM Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
The Keeney Manufacturing Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Technology for Energy Corporation v. Hardy et al (JRG1)
as 3:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Technology for Energy Corporation
Defendant:
William H Hardy and Power Measurements, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Malibu Boats, LLC v. MasterCraft Boat Company LLC (TV1)
as 3:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
Malibu Boats, LLC
Defendant:
MasterCraft Boat Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Maxchief Investments Limited v. Plastic Development Group, LLC (TWP2)
as 3:2016cv00063
Plaintiff:
Maxchief Investments Limited
Defendant:
Plastic Development Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
WCM Industries, Inc. v. Federal Process Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv02041
Plaintiff:
WCM Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Process Corporation, JB Products and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Shelby County Board Of Education
as 2:2016cv02013
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Shelby County Board Of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
