District of Tennessee Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 2,015
Hayslette v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv02759
Plaintiff: Johnny Hayslette
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hayslette v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv02759
Plaintiff: Johnny Hayslette
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dobbins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV2)
as 2:2016cv00298
Plaintiff: Wendy Dobbins
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chatman v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01246
Plaintiff: Lela Chatman
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Overton v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2016cv01244
Plaintiff: Pamela Ann Overton
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Brown v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv00068
Plaintiff: Kevin L. Brown
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McCuiston v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2016cv00374
Plaintiff: Matthew Junior McCuiston
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Shelton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG2)
as 2:2016cv00287
Plaintiff: Michael Lynn Shelton
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Helton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 2:2016cv00286
Plaintiff: Ronda Sue Helton
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Urban v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2016cv00065
Plaintiff: Kimberly A. Urban
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?