U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Civil Rights Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 3,992
Sandy Winner, et al v. SEIU Healthcare Illinois & Ind, et al
as 17-1126
Plaintiff - Appellant: SANDY WINNER, LAURA BASTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: SEIU HEALTHCARE ILLINOIS & INDIANA, BRUCE V. RAUNER, Governor, in his official capacity as Governor of Illinois
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1125
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Lewis Bond v. Andrew Perley, et al
as 17-1114
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEWIS L. BOND
Defendant - Appellee: ANDREW PERLEY, Glencoe Police Detective, CHIEF OF POLICE GLENCOE POLICE DEPARTMENT, VILLAGE OF GLENCOE, ILLINOIS, in Cook County, Illinois and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1097
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Higher Society of Indiana v. Tippecanoe County, Indiana
as 17-1089
Plaintiff - Appellee: HIGHER SOCIETY OF INDIANA
Defendant - Appellant: TIPPECANOE COUNTY, INDIANA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1094
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1059
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Paul Fox v. Timothy Radtke, et al
as 17-1065
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAUL G. FOX
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY RADTKE, JOHN BRANCH
Joshua Vasquez, et al v. Kimberly Foxx, et al
as 17-1061
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSHUA VASQUEZ, MIGUEL CARDONA
Defendant - Appellee: KIMBERLY M. FOXX, in her official capacity as the State's Attorney of Cook County, CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?