US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Choe v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv01019
Plaintiff:
Paul Chang I Choe
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sikander et al v. Lynch et al
as 2:2016cv00550
Plaintiff:
Hayat Sikander and Catherine Sikander
Defendant:
Loretta E Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DWN Inc v United States of America
as 2:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
DWN Inc and Fadhle Suliman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Farr v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2016cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jason M Farr
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, ResCare Workforce Services and Food Share Employment & Training
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
Salem v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Nader Salem
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Kaur v. Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv00997
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson, Thomas Cioppa and Kay Leopold
Plaintiff:
Jasleen Kaur
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Dahir v USA
as 2:2015cv00608
Plaintiff:
Marouf Dahir
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Mohammad et al v. Retailer Operations Division et al
as 2:2015cv00394
Plaintiff:
Nael Mohammad and Brothers Foods Inc
Defendant:
Retailer Operations Division and Douglas G Perry
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 2305
El-Hassan et al v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv00230
Petitioner:
Mohammad El-Hassan , Darine A Ahmad and Krayem Inc
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Al-Ramhi et al v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 2:2015cv00164
Plaintiff:
Nsren Al-Ramhi and Murawaeh Ali
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
