US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Labor Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 291
Acosta, R. v. Comfort Care 4 U, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00226
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Zainabu Kooistra and Comfort Care 4 U, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sadorf, Nedra v. DEMCO, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nedra Sadorf
Defendant:
DEMCO, Inc. and Wall Family Enterprise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Terry, Wayne v. Plato Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00067
Plaintiff:
Wayne Terry
Defendant:
Russel Plato, Scott Plato, Plato Construction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morgan, Zachary v. Lindus Construction, Inc., et al
as 3:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Zachary Morgan
Defendant:
Lindus Construction, Inc. and Crush City Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tenamore, Mary v. Travel Mart, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00952
Defendant:
Travel Mart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Tenamore
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Acosta, R. v. Bowers, Charles et al
as 3:2018cv00949
Respondent:
Donna K's Bar and Family Diner LLC, Charles Bowers and Lost At DK LLC
Petitioner:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Waterstone Mortgage Corporation v. Downey, Deanna et al
as 3:2018cv00859
Defendant:
Elaine Wise, Deanna Downey and David Swann
Plaintiff:
Waterstone Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Moorman, Daryl v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00820
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., Spectrum Management Holding Company, LLC, Charter Communications, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl L. Moorman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hoverson, Mark v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Company
as 3:2018cv00817
Defendant:
Pan-O-Gold Baking Company
Plaintiff:
Mark Hoverson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Paczkowski, Katy v. My Choice Family Care, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00759
Plaintiff:
Katy Paczkowski
Defendant:
My Choice Family Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
