US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 288
Salemme-Ortiz, Alejandrina et al v. Janesville Janitor Service & Industrial Supply, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00507
Defendant:
Janesville Janitor Service & Industrial Supply, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alejandrina Isabel Salemme-Ortiz and Pedro Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Kunze, Steven v. Wind Secure Inc.
as 3:2019cv00439
Defendant:
Wind Secure Inc.
Plaintiff:
Steven Kunze
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DiSalvo, Zachary v. CRM US, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00425
Plaintiff:
Zachary DiSalvo
Defendant:
CRM US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Goodman, James et al v. Restaurant Depot, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00399
Plaintiff:
Dominic Schroeder and James Goodman
Defendant:
Jetro Holdings LLC and Restaurant Depot, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Rodencal, Ashley v. Caillier Clinic, Ltd.
as 3:2019cv00370
Plaintiff:
Ashley Rodencal
Defendant:
Caillier Clinic, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hernandez, Martha et al v. Cameo Investments, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00356
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Cole and Martha Hernandez
Defendant:
Cameo Investments, LLC, Cameo Family Investments, LLC and Cameo Investments II, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wendorf, Joshua v. Village of Plover
as 3:2019cv00251
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wendorf
Defendant:
Village of Plover
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta, R. v. Comfort Care 4 U, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00226
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Zainabu Kooistra and Comfort Care 4 U, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sadorf, Nedra v. DEMCO, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nedra Sadorf
Defendant:
DEMCO, Inc. and Wall Family Enterprise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Terry, Wayne v. Plato Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00067
Plaintiff:
Wayne Terry
Defendant:
Russel Plato, Scott Plato, Plato Construction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
