US District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin Labor Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 291
Glenis, Nicholas v. Prosit-To-You, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00632
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Glenis
Defendant:
Prosit-To-You, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Werner, Doug v. Waterstone Mortgage Corporation
as 3:2017cv00608
Plaintiff:
Doug Werner and William Wiesneski
Defendant:
Waterstone Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Frolik, Milissa v. The Country Inn, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00517
Plaintiff:
Milissa D. Frolik
Defendant:
The Country Inn, LLC and Monty Mouw
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Osborn, Daniel v. Nuno Harvesting Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv00510
Plaintiff:
Daniel Osborn
Defendant:
Nuno Harvesting Corp. and Eric Nuno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wilcox, David v. Badger Bus Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00449
Plaintiff:
David Wilcox
Defendant:
Badger Bus Lines, Inc. and John Meier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marroquin, Helen v. KleenMark Services Corp.
as 3:2017cv00426
Plaintiff:
Helen Marroquin
Defendant:
KleenMark Services Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Shuangfen, Liu et al v. Ni, Kong et al
as 3:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
Liu Shuangfen and Xiong Guangai
Defendant:
Kong Feng Ni, Fugu Eastern Cuisine, Inc. and Ni's American Goldfinch Asian Cuisine Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Camp Douglas Rescue, Inc. v. Klinge-West, Joni
as 3:2017cv00358
Plaintiff:
Camp Douglas Rescue, Inc.
Defendant:
Joni Klinge-West
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Merklein, Steven v. Big Smile Transport, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00357
Plaintiff:
Steven Merklein
Defendant:
Big Smile Transport, LLC, Mat Brosamle and Brian Boland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boutell, Anthony et al v. Craftmaster Painting, LLC
as 3:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boutell , Brian Stout and Shane Morn
Defendant:
Craftmaster Painting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
