Missouri Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 2,040
Zeavision, LLC v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
as 4:2021cv01352
Plaintiff:
Zeavision, LLC
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
***CASE ABANDONED SEE 3:21-5089-CV-SW-SRB OPENED IN ERROR*** v. Thomas et al
as 3:2021cv05088
Defendant:
Mr. Andrew Thomas and Mr. George Martin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Thomas v. Martin
as 3:2021cv05089
Plaintiff:
Mr. Andrew Thomas and Andrew Thomas
Defendant:
Mr. George Martin and George Martin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bowers v. The Fat Plant Society, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00788
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
The Fat Plant Society, LLC, Morten Klinte, Kasey Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Robinson's Catering Inc. v. Brancato's Market LLC
as 4:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
Robinson's Catering Inc. doing business as Brancato's Catering
Defendant:
Brancato's Market LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Bowers v. Lionheart Contracting, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00718
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Lionheart Contracting, LLC, Zachary Saleh, Lifted Logic, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Bowers v. Spa 7, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00716
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Spa 7, LLC doing business as Crossroads Spa and Stacey Rupe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Bowers v. Metrowire Media, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Metrowire Media, LLC, Russell Pearson and Lisa Shackelford
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Bowers v. Environmental Mechanical Contractors, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00717
Plaintiff:
Eric Bowers
Defendant:
Environmental Mechanical Contractors, Inc. and Thomas LoScalzo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
UMB Bank N.A. v. Benton et al
as 4:2021cv00710
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Jessie Benton, Anthony Gude, Daria Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
