Missouri Social Security Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,505
Miller v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kandie Ann Miller
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rundblad v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Janine R. Rundblad
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Linton v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Linton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Winegarner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Melissa Jean Winegarner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Peck v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03074
Plaintiff:
Louise Ann Peck
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dees v. Kijakazi
as 6:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Dees
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Gibbons v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gibbons
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Watts v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Watts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilson v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Shelia Wilson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Peth v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Jason Peth
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
