North Dakota Real Property Cases

Cases filed
Cases 161 - 170 of 371
Save Our Aboriginal Resources (SOAR) et al v. Loudermilk et al
as 4:2013cv00026
Plaintiff: Save Our Aboriginal Resources (SOAR) , Marty Young Bear , Jill Gillette and others
Defendant: Weldon Loudermilk , Kenneth Salazar and Kevin Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
United States of America v. Bender et al
as 3:2013cv00010
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Eric J. Bender and Tammy R. Dietz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gerald E. Solberg Trust v. EOG Resources, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00020
Plaintiff: Gerald E. Solberg Trust
Defendant: EOG Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Gate City Bank v. Gateway Fashion Mall, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00169
Plaintiff: Gate City Bank
Defendant: Gateway Fashion Mall, LLC and Raymond Arjmand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States of America v. Bethke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00166
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Melvin Marvin Bethke, North Dakota Rural Rehabilitation Corporation and Missouri Valley Petroleum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Promissory Note
Lobell v. Capital Transport, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00156
Plaintiff: Kenneth H. Lobell
Defendant: Capital Transport, LLC , Capital Oil Field Services, LLC and Chad Denton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Alliance Pipeline, L.P. v. 7.320 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the SE/4 of Section 31, Township 162 North, Range 88 West, Burke County, North Dakota et al
as 4:2012cv00152
Plaintiff: Alliance Pipeline, L.P.
Defendant: 7.320 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the SE/4 of Section 31, Township 162 North, Range 88 West, Burke County, North Dakota , Dennis Bauer and All Other Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. 9.654 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the NE/4 of Section 33, Township 163 North, Range 84 West, Renville County, North Dakota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00145
Plaintiff: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
Defendant: 9.654 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the NE/4 of Section 33, Township 163 North, Range 84 West, Renville County, North Dakota, Gail Clifford Hutton and All Other Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. 3.304 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the NE/4 of Section 18, Township 163 North, Range 84 West, Renville County, North Dakota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012cv00141
Plaintiff: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
Defendant: 1.788 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the NW/4 of Section 23, Township 163 North, Range 85 West, Renville County, North Dakota, 4.865 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the SE/4 of Section 22, Township 163 North, Range 85 West, Renville County, North Dakota, 5.538 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the SW/4, Lots 3 and 4, and the S/2NW/4 of Section 4, Township 162 North, Range 86 West, Renville County, North Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Alliance Pipeline L.P. v. 4.360 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the S/2 of Section 29, Township 163 North, Range 85 West, Renville County, North Dakota et al
as 4:2012cv00140
Plaintiff: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
Defendant: 4.360 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the S/2 of Section 29, Township 163 North, Range 85 West, Renville County, North Dakota , 4.675 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the SE/4 of Section 30, Township 163 North, Range 85 West, Renville County, North Dakota , Leonard Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?