Ninth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28,476
(SS) Millner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Brian Adrian Millner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
C. v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03458
Plaintiff:
Coleen P. C.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Powers Dumapit v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05316
Plaintiff:
Louise Powers Dumapit
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Paul Conklin v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Paul Conklin
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gonzalez v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02482
Plaintiff:
Teresa Marie Gonzalez
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Denise Carroll v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03410
Plaintiff:
Denise Carroll
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Manuel Navar Diaz v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03412
Plaintiff:
Manuel Navar Diaz
Defendant:
Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Randolph v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jane Randolph
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Randolph v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05318
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jane Randolph
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
Dawn Elizabeth Martin
Defendant:
Comm'r of Soc. Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
