Ninth Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 39,748
Matson v O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Wesley A Matson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schonebaum v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Asa Lee Schonebaum
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Watkins v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Will Watkins, III
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Shana Dawn Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
(SS) Kieffer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan Kieffer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Gorman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Loretta Gorman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sims v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Ray P. Sims
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Carr v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03365
Plaintiff:
Oreginal M. Carr
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Claudia Marian Sharp v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Claudia Marian Sharp
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ballou v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Gordon Dean Ballou
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
