Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 276,107
Bernardino v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2536
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIO BERNARDINO, JR.
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR RALPH DIAZ, Warden TAMMY FOSS, THOMAS, (Captain) and others
Pacific Gas & Electric Company, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
as 24-2527
Petitioner:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Daniels v. Los Angeles County Superior Court
as 24-2528
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE C. DANIELS
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 24-2533
Plaintiff:
ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF ALASKA, NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT, VENETIE VILLAGE COUNCIL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Interior and others
Patel v. Alphabet Inc., et al.
as 24-2530
Plaintiff:
RAJ PATEL
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC., GOOGLE LLC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A Governmental Entity and others
BGH Holdings, LLC, et al. v. D. L. Evans Bank
as 24-2540
Plaintiff:
BGH HOLDINGS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, GINGER ATHERTON and HENRY DEAN, and their marital community
Defendant:
D. L. EVANS BANK
Molina-Cardoza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2514
Petitioner:
SANDRA MOLINA-CARDOZA and MATEO GARCIA-MOLINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendoza Arce v. Garland
as 24-2515
Petitioner:
JOSE HENRY MENDOZA ARCE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Puente-Lares v. Garland
as 24-2516
Petitioner:
MARIO PUENTE-LARES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
