US District Court for the Northern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 398
In re: Application of: Super Vitaminas, S. A.,
as 5:2017mc80125
Movant:
Super Vitaminas, S.A
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Mosser Companies, Inc. v. Eberwein
as 4:2017cv05713
Plaintiff:
Mosser Companies, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert D Eberwein and Chaledeeannka Deborah Ann Goyens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Xilinx, Inc.
as 5:2017mc80116
Plaintiff:
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
Defendant:
Xilinx, Inc.
Movant:
UMC Group (USA)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Monica v. Becerra et al
as 3:2017cv05103
Plaintiff:
Martin Monica
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kindt et al v. AEROVIAS DE MXICO, S.A. DE C.V et al
as 5:2017cv04999
Plaintiff:
Malina Kindt and George Pappas
Defendant:
AEROVIAS DE MXICO, S.A. DE C.V , GRUPO AEROMXICO S.A.B. DE C.V. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chavez v. Meza
as 3:2017cv04863
Plaintiff:
Maria Chavez
Defendant:
Rudy Meza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. In Re: Ex Parte Application of Sony Mobile Communications (China) Co., Ltd.
as 5:2017mc80090
Defendant:
In Re: Ex Parte Application of Sony Mobile Communications (China) Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
In the Matter of the Administrative Inspection of:
as 5:2017mc80088
Defendant:
Ansr Pharmacy 101 DEA Reg. No,: FA2427587 581 McCray Street Hollister, California 95023
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Administrative Inspection of:
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Nikon Corporation v. GlobalFoundries U.S., Inc.
as 5:2017mc80071
Plaintiff:
Nikon Corporation
Defendant:
GlobalFoundries U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Sweeney v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
as 3:2017cv02777
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sweeney
Defendant:
Tani Cantil-Sakauye , Xavier Becerra and Jefferson B. Sessions, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
