US District Court for the Southern District of California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,275
Nunez v. Alza Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv02098
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isaac v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2020cv01993
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
De Taype v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2020cv01954
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Jesus Hedy Bellido De Taype
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2020cv01865
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Denise B. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooley v. Novo Nordisk Inc.
as 3:2020cv01776
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joanne Hooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Kruschinska v. Novo Nordisk Inc.
as 3:2020cv01775
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon Rose Kruschinska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl
Sevene v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv01691
Defendant:
Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated, Cook Medical, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Sevene, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Loomis v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2020cv01573
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Heather Loomis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp,
as 3:2020cv01533
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Mary Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lloyd v. Johnson & Johnson Corp. et al
as 3:2020cv01508
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. individually doing business as Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, a Division of Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Corp., Does 1 to 100 Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Ailen Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
