District of Idaho Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,272
Piland v. State of Idaho
as 1:2016cv00326
Petitioner: Kelly M Piland
Respondent: State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford v. Yordy
as 1:2016cv00320
Petitioner: Shane Crawford
Respondent: Keith Yordy
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Workman et al v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00309
Plaintiff: Kenneth Michael Workman, Ray Marvin Nichols
Defendant: Kevin Kempf, Corizon Medical Services, Murray Young and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Andoe v. Kemph et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Plaintiff: Johnny R Andoe
Defendant: Kevin Kemph, Keith Yordy, Mark Olson and others
Movant: Douglas Raymond Colvin
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2016cv00252
Plaintiff: William Fletcher
Defendant: Corizon Health Services, C. Brown
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dick v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00253
Plaintiff: Kenneth Dick
Defendant: Kevin Kempf, Sheriff of Canyon County, Sheriff of Jefferson County and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodrick v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00243
Plaintiff: Dan Goodrick
Defendant: Idaho Department of Correction, Idaho Board of Correction, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 1:2016cv00229
Plaintiff: Jimmy C Moore
Defendant: Corizon Health Services, Murry Young, John Migilori and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Soper v. Floyd Wilcox and Sons Inc
as 1:2016cv00225
Plaintiff: Thomas M Soper
Defendant: Floyd Wilcox and Sons Inc
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Grijalva v. Canyon County
as 4:2016cv00199
Plaintiff: Raymond Grijalva, II
Defendant: Canyon County
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?