US District Court for the Western District of Washington Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,581
Tatpa v. Jaddou et al
as 2:2023cv01751
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Quick et al v. Puhan et al
as 2:2024cv00629
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Familias Unidas por La Justicia, AFL-CIO
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Familias Unidas por La Justicia, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor and Julie A Su
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America et al v. Catholic Health Initiatives et al
as 3:2018cv05404
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
PARSA v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 2:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Navid PARSA
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, U.S. Embassy in Ankara Turkey, U.S. Secretary of St Antony Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Triple B Corporation v. Caer Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Triple B Corporation a Washington Corporation doing business as Charlie's Produce
Defendant:
Caer Inc a Delaware Corporation doing business as Yumi, Angela Sutherland and Evely Rusli
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Novikova v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Svetlana Novikova
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Jaddou, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
