US District Court for the Western District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 8,915
Irby v. Morner et al
as 2:2023cv01927
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jon Irby
Defendant:
Jack Morner, Kevin Bowen and Ronald Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphreys v. Securus Phone et al
as 3:2023cv06120
Plaintiff:
Scott Wesley Humphreys
Defendant:
Securus Phone, More, A More and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezell v. McCann
as 2:2023cv01882
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamell Ezell
Defendant:
Shawna McCann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzales v. Bennett
as 2:2023cv01883
Petitioner:
Jesse R Gonzales and Jesse Gonzales
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grimsley v. Nike Inc
as 2:2023cv01894
Plaintiff:
Robert Alexander Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belander v. Pedro
as 3:2023cv06132
Petitioner:
Damian Belander
Respondent:
Corey Fuhure and David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillman v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01835
Plaintiff:
Lamone L Tillman
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Hass, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallette v. Warner
as 2:2023cv01844
Petitioner:
Xavier Gabriel Mallette
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hurley v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv06091
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Hurley and Ricky
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Reichard et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ray Clarence Rogers
Defendant:
L Reichard, Taylor, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
