US District Court for the District of Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 509
Agwiak v. Peters et al
as 4:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Arnold Jacob Agwiak
Defendant:
Nathaniel Peters, Chris Knowles and John Putikka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Roger Dail Copeland, Sr.
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lott v. Metzger et al
as 4:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mike Lott
Defendant:
Julia Metzger, State of Alaska and State of Alaska D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiester v. Saxby et al
as 3:2022cv00004
Petitioner:
Ryan Luke Kiester
Respondent:
Kevin M. Saxby, District Attorney Barcode DA3AN and Justin Allen Tapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Aarseth et al
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Steven John Miller
Defendant:
Eric A. Aarseth, Katholyn A. Runnels and Nathan H. Lockwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eclips v. Rice et al
as 1:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Luna Eclips
Defendant:
Rice, Long, S. Dial and others
Eclips v. Olson et al
as 1:2021cv00026
Plaintiff:
Luna Eclips
Defendant:
L. Olson, Joe Beaudrault, Forster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burk v. Elmore et al.
as 3:2021cv00277
Plaintiff:
Johnnylee Preston Burk
Defendant:
Thomas Elmore, David Knapp, Richard Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson et al v. Ennis et al
as 1:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Samual Johnathan Thompson and Clarence C. Shirley, III
Defendant:
Justin Ennis, Earl L. Houser and Jacqueline Villacorta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDermott v. Hayes et al
as 3:2021cv00274
Plaintiff:
Daniel Josef McDermott
Defendant:
Ron Hayes and Walter E. Gilmour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
