US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,613
Daniel v. Wakefield & Associates LLC
as 6:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Darrell Daniel
Defendant:
Wakefield & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Roussel v. Capital Accounts LLC
as 3:2023cv01694
Plaintiff:
Amanda Roussel
Defendant:
Capital Accounts LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Serra Chevrolet Inc v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2023cv01675
Plaintiff:
Serra Chevrolet Inc
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Neville v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
William Neville
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and E&C's Snacks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Williams v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 5:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
Destiny Peyton Williams
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. National Credit Adjusters LLC
as 5:2023cv01538
Plaintiff:
Gennie Jones
Defendant:
National Credit Adjusters LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Perry v. Frost-Arnett Company Inc
as 5:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Shelia Perry
Defendant:
Frost-Arnett Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chick v. TrueAccord Corp.
as 2:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chick
Defendant:
TrueAccord Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pickle v. CKS Prime Investments LLC
as 2:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pickle
Defendant:
CKS Prime Investments LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Freeman v. Frontline Asset Strategies LLC
as 7:2023cv01451
Plaintiff:
James Freeman
Defendant:
Frontline Asset Strategies LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
