US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,615
Coleman v. WarnerMedia Direct LLC
as 3:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Karina Coleman
Defendant:
WarnerMedia Direct LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Febles v. WarnerMedia Direct LLC
as 3:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Kristi Febles
Defendant:
WarnerMedia Direct LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Everett v. Resurgent Capital Services, LP et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Sadie K Everett and Sadie K Barton
Defendant:
Resurgent Capital Services, LP and LVNV Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
West v. WarnerMedia Direct LLC
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Michele West
Defendant:
WarnerMedia Direct LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Parker v. WarnerMedia Direct LLC
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Maritta Parker
Defendant:
WarnerMedia Direct LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cobb v. Hunter Warfield Inc
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cobb
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024mc00280
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
Orrick v. ARstrat LLC
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Cindy Orrick
Defendant:
ARstrat LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dawson et al v. Lauderdale County et al
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Dawson and Timothy Weakley
Defendant:
Lauderdale County, State of Alabama, Lauderdale County Revenue Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Combs et al v. Staggs et al
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Bradley Combs
Defendant:
Timothy Staggs, Timothy Weakley, Hannah Weakley Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
