US District Court for the District of Arizona Contract Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 117
KE&G Construction, Inc. v. Sundt Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00132
Plaintiff:
KE&G Construction, Inc. and KE&G Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Sundt Construction, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Federal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
L.E. Electric, Inc. v. Sundt Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2007at10049
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
L.E. Electric, Inc. v. Sundt Construction, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00115
Plaintiff:
L.E. Electric, Inc.
Defendant:
Sundt Construction, Inc., Federal Insurance Company, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
A & S Paving, Inc v. Larkor Construction Company, Inc., et al
as 4:2007cv00028
Defendant:
Larkor Construction Company, Inc., Macro-Z Technology Company and Safeco Insurance
Plaintiff:
A&S Paving Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
A & S Paving, Inc. v. Macro-Z Technology Company, et al
as 4:2007cv00027
Plaintiff:
A&S Paving Inc
Defendant:
Macro-Z-Technology and Safeco Insurance
Counter Claimant:
Macro-Z-Technology and Safeco Insurance
Counter Defendant:
A&S Paving Inc and A&S Paving Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Western Technologies, Inc v. Jacobsen Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2006cv02716
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
U.S. Prefab, Inc. v. Norquay Construction, Inc. et al.
as 2:2006cv01598
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
International Surfacing System v. International Fidelity Insurance Company
as 3:2006cv01289
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Starkweather Roofing, Inc. v. C Services, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2006cv00635
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
The United States for the Use of Crescent Supply Co., Inc. v. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. et al
as 4:2005cv00670
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
