U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Bergus v. Florian
as 23-1884
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BORIS O. BERGUS
Defendant / Appellant:
AGUSTIN M. FLORIAN
Bergus v. Florian
as 23-1458
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BORIS O. BERGUS
Defendant / Appellant:
AGUSTIN M. FLORIAN
MAZ Partners LP v. Shear
as 17-1821
Defendant - Appellant/Cross-Appellee:
BRUCE A. SHEAR
Plaintiff - Appellee/Cross-Appellant:
MAZ PARTNERS LP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
PETER BLAKESLEE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ACADIA HEALTHCARE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
PHC, INC., DONALD E. ROBAR, DOUGLAS J. SMITH and others
Van Ingen v. Ha-Ngoc, et al
as 15-1783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN J. VAN INGEN
Defendant - Appellee:
TUAN HA-NGOC, HENRI A. TERMEER, KENNETH BATE and others
Liang v. Berger, et al
as 15-1471
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YU LIANG, derivatively on behalf of Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ARKADY LIVITZ, derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant Ariad Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
HARVEY BERGER, JAY R. LAMARCHE, ATHANASE LAVIDAS and others
Sarnacki v. Golden, et al
as 14-1414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON SARNACKI, derivatively on behalf of Smith & Wesson Holding Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. GOLDEN, JOHN A. KELLY, BARRY M. MONHEIT and others
Operative Plasters' and Cement v. Hooley, et al
as 13-2377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OPERATIVE PLASTERS' AND CEMENT MASONS' LOCAL UNION OFFICERS' AND EMPLOYEES' PENSION FUND, Derivatively on Behalf of State Street Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH L. HOOLEY, EDWARD J. RESCH, RONALD E. LOGUE and others
MAZ Partners LP, et al v. PHC, Inc., et al
as 13-2273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAZ PARTNERS LP, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and PETER BLAKESLEE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
PHC, INC., BRUCE A. SHEAR, DONALD E. ROBAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
