U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Harrington, et al v. Tetraphase Pharm. Inc., et al
as 17-1524
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PLYMOUTH COUNTY RETIREMENT SYSTEM and NEWVANA VENTURES LIMITED
Plaintiff:
DAN SCHLAPKOHL, DARYLL HANDELL, MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GUY MACDONALD, JOHN CRAIG THOMPSON, DAVID LUBNER and others
Kader, et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al
as 17-1139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM KADER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, MORAD GHODOOSHIM, ROGER LAM and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC., CHRIS GARABEDIAN, SANDESH MAHATME and others
Brennan, et al v. Zafgen, Inc., et al
as 16-2057
Plaintiff:
AVIAD BESSLER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situtated and THEODORE J. DALY
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY BRENNAN, RON KENNER, KEVIN KOZIATEK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ZAFGEN, INC. and THOMAS E. HUGHES
Interested Party:
OAKLAND COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Movant:
BRENNAN GROUP
In Re: Biogen Inc. Sec. Litig.
as 16-1976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GBR GROUP LTD
Plaintiff:
NICOLE TEHRANI
Defendant - Appellee:
BIOGEN, INC., GEORGE A. SCANGOS, PAUL J. CLANCY and others
Interested Party:
BIOGEN INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR GROUP, CHILLAR FAMILY TRUST, THE CITY OF MIAMI FIRE FIGHTERS' AND POLICE OFFICERS' RETIREMENT TRUST and others
Cobran, et al v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., et al
as 16-1658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK A. COBRAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and STEVE FLEISCHMANN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BARADARIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and BIJESH AMIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS, INC., CHRIS GARABEDIAN and ED KAYE
Defendant:
SANDESH MAHATME
Interested Party:
BRIAN HEIDRICH and CORBAN GROUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
