U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Satchi v. Rheon U.S.A.
as 17-1640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THIRU SATCHI, as administrator of the estate of Yogambigai Pasupathipillai
Defendant - Appellee:
RHEON U.S.A
Defendant:
INTRALOX, LLC
Reyes, et al v. Kane Caribbean
as 17-1587
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARLOS J. REYES, MARIBELLA REYES, A. REYES-REYES, Minor and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KANE CARIBBEAN
Defendant:
KOMATSU AMERICA and KOMATSU LATIN AMERICA
McKeague v. One World Technologies, Inc., et al
as 16-2148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD MCKEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Swift v. Spatafore
as 16-1967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SWIFT
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY SPATAFORE, Inside Liability Adjuster Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
Swift v. Spatafore
as 16-1883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SWIFT
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY SPATAFORE, inside liability adjuster Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company
LaPage, et al v. E-One Inc., et al
as 15-1909
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DIANE LAPAGE, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Allan P. LePage
Plaintiff:
ALLAN P. LEPAGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
E-ONE INC., f/k/a Emergency One Inc.
Defendant:
GREENWOOD EMERGENCY VEHICLE, INC.
Interested Party:
KINGSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING ASSOCIATES, INC. and FORSTER ASSOCIATES, LLC
LaPage, et al v. E-One Inc., et al
as 15-1860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANE LAPAGE, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Allan P. LePage
Plaintiff:
ALLAN P. LEPAGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
E-ONE INC., f/k/a Emergency One Inc.
Defendant:
GREENWOOD EMERGENCY VEHICLE, INC.
Interested Party:
KINGSTON FIRE DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING ASSOCIATES, INC. and FORSTER ASSOCIATES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
