U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,211
Gustafson v. Luke
as 16-4156
Plaintiff - Appellant: TROY GUSTAFSON
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICER JOHN LUKE
Miller v. Jones, et al
as 16-6254
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARCUS RUSELL MILLER
Defendant - Appellee: JUSTIN JONES, Director for the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, MARK KNUTSON, Directors Designee, WARDEN MIKE MULLIN, Warden for the Jess Dunn Correctional Facility Oklahoma Department of corrections and others
Stine v. Samuels
as 16-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant: MIKEAL G. STINE
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Williams v. Unknown Federal Agents, et al
as 16-6250
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee: UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Himes v. Enid Police Department, et al
as 16-6244
Plaintiff - Appellant: AUDREY ALLEN HIMES
Defendant - Appellee: ENID POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERTO NORTON, Officer, KEVIN EVERLEY, Officer and others
Reed v. Early, et al
as 16-1332
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY C. REED
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES EARLY, JR., RICK RAEMISCH, JAMES FALK and others
Heard v. Chavez, et al
as 16-2198
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN HEARD
Defendant - Appellee: C. CHAVEZ, Mailroom Staff, Counts 2-9, FNU BHAKTA
John Umoren v. Warden Byrd, et al
as 16-6230
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN WILSON UMOREN
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN BYRD, Warden of prison, individually, FNU BRAGGS, Deputy Warden, individually, CHIEF HILLIGOSS, Chief of Management, individually and others
Harper v. Wyoming Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 16-8082
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT J. HARPER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CORIZON HEALTH, INC., EDDIE WILSON, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary and others
Villa v. Colorado Dept. of Correction
as 16-1308
Plaintiff - Appellant: REYNALDO Y. VILLA
Defendant - Appellee: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?