U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 7,346
Bobby Glenn v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-14058
Petitioner / Appellant:
BOBBY GLENN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Priscilla Ellis v. Warden
as 23-14056
Petitioner / Appellant:
PRISCILLA ANN ELLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
Isaiah Dunbar v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-14034
Petitioner / Appellant:
ISAIAH L. DUNBAR
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Joseph Bozicevich v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-14016
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH C. BOZICEVICH
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Willie Newton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-14008
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE MATHERS NEWTON
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Phillip Wright, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-14030
Petitioner / Appellant:
PHILLIP WRIGHT, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jermaine Williamson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-14013
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERMAINE LAMAR WILLIAMSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Herman Morris, Jr. v. William Rumer
as 23-13997
Petitioner / Appellant:
HERMAN MORRIS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM C. RUMER
James Parish v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13971
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES RAY PARISH
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Frenel Cajilus v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13985
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRENEL CAJILUS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
