U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Paul Danko, Jr. v. US Government
as 11-2405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL DANKO, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
US GOVERNMENT
Ines Lomando v. USA, et al
as 11-1957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INES LOMANDO, as Administratrix Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Laura Lomando, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHANIE REYNOLDS, M.D., TREVOR TALBERT, M.D. and others
Tilli v. ManorCare Health Services, et al
as 11-1119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL TILLI
Defendant - Appellee:
MANORCARE HEALTH SER, PATRICIA STAHR, GNANAPRAKASH GOPAL and others
Dorothy Schell, et al v. USA, et al
as 11-1019
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOROTHY SCHELL and WILLIAM SCHELL, w/h
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UPMC HEALTH SYS, EMERGENCY RESOURCE MGMT INC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UPMC HORIZON, JEFFREY MOLDOVAN, D.O. and UPMC EMERGENCY MED
Daniel Rastall, et al v. Fermin Garcia, et al
as 10-2257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL E. RASTALL and LAURA RASTALL, his wife
Defendant - Appellee:
FERMIN C. GARCIA, MD, JEFFREY P. CARPENTER, MD, BENJAMIN M. JACKSON, MD and others
Sara Doolin v. James Kasin, et al
as 09-4060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARA L DOOLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES KASIN, GOVERNOR JUAN F. LUIS HOSP MED CTR and GREGORY MOORMAN
Felicia Vitale, et al v. Carrier Clinic Inc
as 09-3571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FELICIA VITALE and LOUIS VITALE
Defendant - Appellee:
CARRIER CLINIC INC
Elizabeth Liggon-Redding v. Roslyn Souser, et al
as 09-3394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIZABETH LIGGON-REDDING
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSLYN SOUSER, Dr. and MAIN LINE HOSP INC, et el
Darryl Booker v. USA
as 09-2688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Jones v. USA
as 08-4882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
