US District Court for the Central District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,350
Mark Alan Woodend v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Woodend
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LaTisha Ballard v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
LaTisha Ballard
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
David Mad Lujan v. Martin OMalley
as 5:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
David Mad Lujan
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jonathan Aviles v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Aviles
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jason Gomez v. Maritn J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Jason Gomez
Defendant:
Martin J. OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sanda Patricia Fox v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02662
Plaintiff:
SANDI PATRICIA FOX
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Rodney Burns v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02655
Plaintiff:
Rodney Burns
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pimienta v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02586
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Pimienta
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Riki D. Gurrola Quintana v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00667
Plaintiff:
Riki D. Gurrola Quintana
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Holmes v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02538
Plaintiff:
Stephen Phillip Holmes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
