US District Court for the Central District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 17,500
Bao Zhang et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2024cv02656
Plaintiff:
BAO ZHANG, JING FENG and QIANXI FENG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES LOS ANGELES ASYLUM OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Christopher Nelson v. Axos Bank et al
as 2:2024cv02664
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nelson
Defendant:
Axos Bank and Axos Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Zoulin Cai
as 2:2024cv02619
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Zoulin Cai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Hamid Bolooki v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
as 2:2024mc00049
Plaintiff:
Hamid Bolooki
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Barry v. Racing Expressions LLC
as 5:2024mc00005
Petitioner:
John E Barry
Defendant:
Racing Expressions LLC
United States of America v. Nguyen
as 8:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sandy Mai Trang Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Hudson Private LP v. Creative Wealth Media Finance Corp.
as 2:2024mc00047
Plaintiff:
Hudson Private LP
Defendant:
Creative Wealth Media Finance Corp.
United States of America v. Denise Kim
as 2:2024cv02569
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Denise Kim
Garnishee:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., Bank of America and American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3205 Garnishment
Pete Buttigieg v. USA Logistics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02573
Plaintiff:
Pete Buttigieg
Defendant:
USA Logistics, Inc.
Mission Integrated Technologies, LLC v. Fournier
as 2:2024mc00048
Petitioner:
Mission Integrated Technologies, LLC
Respondent:
Kenneth Fournier
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
