U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit Other Statutes Cases

Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 182
Thomas Coleman v. Frank Kendall, III
as 23-5190
Plaintiff / Appellant: Thomas G. Coleman, Major, USAF (ret.)
Defendant / Appellee: Frank Kendall, III, The Honorable, Secretary of the Air Force
El Puente, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-5189
Plaintiff / Appellant: El Puente, CORALations and Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant / Appellee: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Scott A. Spellmon, Lieutenant, Chief of Engineers and Commanding General, Army Corps of Engineers, Gina M. Raimondo, Secretary of Commerce and others
Amicus Curiae: Toabajenos en Defensa del Ambiente, Amigx del M.A.R., Rachel Silverstein, Ph.D. and others
Delaware Valley Regional Center, LLC, et al v. DHS, et al
as 23-5175
Plaintiff / Appellant: Delaware Valley Regional Center, LLC, DVRC SEPTA II, LP, Wenjun Wang and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Matthew Sherven v. USA, et al
as 23-5174
Plaintiff / Appellant: Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency, William Burns, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and others
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. DOI, et al
as 23-5170
Plaintiff / Appellant: Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. DOI, et al
as 23-5162
Plaintiff / Appellee: Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the U.S. Department of the Interior and others
Heidi Stirrup, et al v. DOD, et al
as 23-5094
Plaintiff / Appellant: Heidi Stirrup, personally and in her capacity as a member of the United States Air Force Academy Board of Visitors, Mark Edward Green, personally and in his official capacity as a member of the United States Military Academy Board of Visitors, and a Member of the Unites States House Armed Services Committee, and the United States Congress, Ralph Warren Norman, Jr., personally and in his official capacity as a Member of the United States Congress and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin, III, General, USA (Ret.), in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Defense, United States Department of the Air Force and others
Loma Linda-Inland Consortium for Healthcare Educa v. NLRB
as 23-5096
Plaintiff / Appellant: Loma Linda-Inland Consortium for Healthcare Education, doing business as Loma Linda University Self-Education Consortium
Defendant / Appellee: National Labor Relations Board
Save Jobs USA v. DHS
as 23-5089
Plaintiff / Appellant: Save Jobs USA
Defendant / Appellee: United States Department of Homeland Security, Office of General Counsel
Intervenor / Appellee: Anujkumar Dhamija and Immigration Voice
Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 23-5076
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Defendant / Appellee: Debra A. Haaland, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior and United States Department of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan, MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, Detroit Entertainment, L.L.C. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?