US District Court for the Eastern District of California Other Statutes Cases

Other Statutory Actions Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 101 - 110 of 3,883
USA v. Newbold
as 2:2023at00390
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Brent Lee Newbold
USA v. Newbold
as 2:2023mc00171
In Re: Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Brent Lee Newbold
USA v. Newbold
as 2:2023mc00163
In Re: Ally Bank
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Brent Lee Newbold
USA v. Newbold
as 2:2023mc00164
In Re: Standard Retirement Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Brent Lee Newbold
USA v. Newbold
as 2:2023mc00161
In Re: TD Ameritrade, Inc.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Brent Lee Newbold
USA v. Newbold
as 2:2023mc00165
In Re: 7-Eleven, Inc.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Brent Lee Newbold
USA v. Newbold
as 2:2023mc00162
In Re: Invesco Investment Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Brent Lee Newbold
v. State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2023at00369
Defendant: State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, Azuma Corporation, Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California v. Azuma Corporation et al
as 2:2023at00370
Plaintiff: State of California, ex rel. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California
Defendant: Azuma Corporation, Phillip Del Rosa, Wendy Del Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
State of CA v. Azuma Corp., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00743
Plaintiff: State of California
Defendant: Azuma Corporation, Phillip Del Rosa, Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?