US District Court for the Eastern District of California Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 25,048
(PC) Freeman v. Dudley et al
as 2:2024cv01258
Plaintiff:
Kyle Freeman
Defendant:
Dudley, R. Singh, E. Tardd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court County of Modoc
as 2:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court County of Modoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court County of Lassen
as 2:2024cv01253
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court County of Lassen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court County of Trinity
as 2:2024cv01255
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court County of Trinity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court, County of Siskiyou
as 2:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court, County of Siskiyou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Chapa
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Chapa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Ulit
as 1:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Wayne Ulit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Thomas v. Akau et al
as 1:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Akau and Goodhue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) DePonte v. Bowman, et al.
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Thomas v. Escobedo et al
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Escobedo and Sargent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
