US District Court for the Northern District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Anisetty v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Sathish Anisetty
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bradley v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
David Ray Bradley
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv06718
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bobby Sylvester Thompson
Defendant:
Mr. Martin O'malley, Martin J. O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pardini v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06582
Plaintiff:
Amanda Pardini
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Murry v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv03892
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jenile Murry
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McCoy v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Leila Cruz McCoy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pardini v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv02751
Plaintiff:
Connie Pardini
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wilson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv08390
Plaintiff:
Douglas John Wilson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ashworth v. Azar
as 5:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff:
Marleen Ashworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Langley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv04583
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rose Langley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
