US District Court for the District of Connecticut Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 436
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. St. Vincent's Medical Center
as 3:2016cv00196
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
St. Vincent's Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Fletcher-Terry Company, LLC v. Alfa Automation U.S.A. Inc.
as 3:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
Fletcher-Terry Company, LLC
Defendant:
Alfa Automation U.S.A. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC et al v. Munchkin, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC and International Refills Company Ltd.
Defendant:
Munchkin, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Man-Q Corp. v. Conair Corp.
as 3:2016cv00091
Plaintiff:
Man-Q Corp.
Defendant:
Conair Corp
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Evans Cooling Systems, Inc. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
Evans Cooling Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Audi of America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
StormTech LLC et al v. Cultec, Inc
as 3:2015cv01890
Plaintiff:
StormTech LLC and Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Cultec, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chapco, Inc. et al v. Woodway USA, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01665
Plaintiff:
Chapco, Inc. and Samsara, LLC
Defendant:
Woodway USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc
as 3:2015cv01619
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Thule, Inc. v. Cocoweb.com Inc.
as 3:2015cv01607
Plaintiff:
Thule, Inc.
Defendant:
Cocoweb.com Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Commercial Sewing Inc v. Great Lakes Boat Top LLC
as 3:2015cv01538
Plaintiff:
Commercial Sewing Inc
Defendant:
Great Lakes Boat Top LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
