US District Court for the District of Connecticut Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 439
Plasma Air International, Inc. v. Global Plasma Solutions, LLC
as 3:2015cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plasma Air International, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Plasma Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cottingham Agencies, LTD et al v. Murphy et al
as 3:2015cv00996
Plaintiff:
Cottingham Agencies, LTD and Funtime Handels GesmbH
Defendant:
Harry Murphy, Alan Ferguson, Murphy Amusements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Conair Corporation et al v. Shabat et al
as 3:2015cv00940
Plaintiff:
Conair Corporation and Babyliss Faco Sprl
Defendant:
Shahar Shabat and E.L. Sales Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lego System A/S v. Rubicon Communications, LP
as 3:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
Lego System A/S
Defendant:
Rubicon Communications, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Huang v. Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
as 3:2015cv00738
Plaintiff:
Han-Ching Huang
Defendant:
Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Huang v. Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
as 2:2015cv00738
Plaintiff:
Han-Huang Huang
Defendant:
Harbor Freight USA Tools Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Benedetti v. University of Connecticut et al
as 3:2015cv00679
Plaintiff:
George W. Benedetti
Defendant:
University of Connecticut and Center for Science and Technology Commercialization
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Whelen Engineering Co Inc v. Viviox et al
as 3:2015cv00508
Plaintiff:
Whelen Engineering Co Inc
Defendant:
Viviox, Abe Y. Haas, Ben S. Hoff and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Eveready Battery Co Inc et al v. Dorco USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Eveready Battery Co Inc and Schick Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Dorco USA, Inc. and Pace Shave
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jacobs Vehicle Sys Inc. v. FCA US LLC
as 3:2015cv00350
Plaintiff:
Jacobs Vehicle Sys Inc
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
