US District Court for the District of Columbia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 9,849
SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD. v. BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD. et al
as 1:2024mc00012
Plaintiff:
SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.
Defendant:
BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD., MIANYANG BOE OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., ORDOS YUANSHENG OPTOELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and others
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00237
Not Yet Classified:
TRAMAINE NEWSOME and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00242
Not Yet Classified:
TRAMAINE NEWSOME
Plaintiff:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
IN RE: ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS
as 1:2024mc00010
Not Yet Classified:
ORDER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1782 GRANTING LEAVE TO OBTAIN DISCOVERY FOR USE IN FOREIGN PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner:
C5 CAPITAL LIMITED and ANDRE' PIENAAR
Respondent:
Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP and STEIN MITHCELL BEATO & MISSNER LLP
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Michael FORSTER and NO PARTY
Defendant:
Wolf MCGAVRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILLIAMS v. FENWICK
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
RHONDA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JONATHAN FENWICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR A FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00253
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR A FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY v. TURNER
as 1:2024mc00005
Plaintiff:
FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DEBORAH TURNER
IN RE WILLIAM KEEN
as 1:2024mc00011
Not Yet Classified:
WILLIAM KEEN
Interested Party:
PRESS COALITION
Respondent:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
