US District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,933
XELUP v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE et al
as 1:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
TUSHKHUMOC XELUP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, GINA RAIMONDO, UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SGCI HOLDINGS III LLC et al v. FEDERAL COMUNNICATIONS COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01204
Defendant:
ALLEN MEDIA GROUP, INC., FEDERAL COMUNNICATIONS COMMISSION, JESSICA ROSENWORCEL and others
Plaintiff:
SGCI HOLDINGS III LLC and SOOHYUNG KIM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
ARAB STUDENT UNION OF JACKSONREED HIGH SCHOOL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
ARAB STUDENT UNION OF JACKSONREED HIGH SCHOOL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and SAH BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORES v. GOLDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
VALERIE FLORES
Defendant:
ERIC GOLDEN, ISIAIH CRUM and REBECCA FABBRO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SNYDER et al v. WASHINGTON NATIONALS BASEBALL CLUB, LLC
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
NICK SNYDER and DAVID COYNE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON NATIONALS BASEBALL CLUB, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
FLOWERS v. GOODMAN
as 1:2024cv01177
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
AL GOODMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. WEINER
as 1:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
RICKIE WEINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. CLARY
as 1:2024cv01179
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
RAYMOND CLARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. SWARTZ
as 1:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
CONRAD SWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. PLYMOUTH ROCK INSURANCE
as 1:2024cv01180
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY FLOWERS
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH ROCK INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
