US District Court for the District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 2,102
FAULKNER v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES
as 1:2020cv00163
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICES
Petitioner:
ALVIN FAULKNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CERRUTI v. BARR
as 1:2020cv00096
Petitioner:
MICHAEL CERRUTI
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DRUMMOND v. MORGAN et al
as 1:2019cv03830
Respondent:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL and PHIL MORGAN
Petitioner:
BYRON SENTRAL DRUMMOND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GREENWOOD v. BOLSTER
as 1:2019cv03768
Defendant:
MARK J. BOLSTER
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE O. GREENWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRUM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03769
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DAVID HALL CRUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAVICTOR v. BARR
as 1:2019cv03657
Plaintiff:
LYNN M. LAVICTOR
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HUNTER v. JAMISON et al
as 1:2019cv03463
Defendant:
CLARENCE THOMAS, U.S. SENATE AND FEDERAL LEGISLATURE and SEVEN JUSTICES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT
Plaintiff:
DARRYL M. MCGUIRE
Respondent:
J.L JAMISON and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
NATHAN HUNTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MADSEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03602
Petitioner:
KURT R. MADSEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARLOW v. SUNIA, et al
as 1:2019cv03442
Petitioner:
JAMES GLENN BARLOW
Respondent:
SOLIALI'I FALEPO, TAUESE VA'AOMALA SUNIA and DAVID L. BERNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
