US District Court for the District of Columbia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 315
DERRINGTON v. D.C. D.O.C.
as 1:2016cv00648
Plaintiff:
MARQUELL ALONZO DERRINGTON
Defendant:
D.C. D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. FCI FORT DIX MEDICAL DIRECTOR et al
as 1:2016cv00612
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CARTER
Defendant:
FCI FORT DIX MEDICAL DIRECTOR, FCI FORT DIX MEDICAL WARDEN and FBOP NE REGIONAL DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00459
Plaintiff:
COREY FERNANDO RUSSELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U.S. MARSHAL'S SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. HOLLIDAY et al
as 1:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
MITCHEL HOLLIDAY , CHARLES SAMUELS and DONALD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WATKINS v. LAWSKY et al
as 1:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WATKINS
Defendant:
BENJAMIN LAWSKY and HAROLD D. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS v. CANNON et al
as 1:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL LENARD REYNOLDS
Defendant:
AL CANNON, LUKE and HABERSHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GORDON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv00070
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA, UNKNOWN POLICY MAKER and UNKNOWN SENATE MEMBER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2015cv02139
Plaintiff:
MILES ORLANDO LEE
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, LORETTA LYNCH, STATE OF MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUSTILLO v. DANIELS, et al
as 1:2015cv02143
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO BUSTILLO
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, DAVID LUKENS, J. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
