District of Cases

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 31,249
BARTOLUCCI et al
as 1:2017cv00097
Plaintiff: DANIEL J. BARTOLUCCI , EDWARD UNGVARSKY
Cause Of Action: Antitrust Litigation
Story of Stuff Project et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
as 1:2017cv00098
Plaintiff: Story of Stuff Project , Courage Campaign Institute
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00099
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity-(Citizenship)
DOSS v. U.S. PROBATION OFFICE et al
as 1:2017cv00093
Plaintiff: ANGEL PASTOR DOSS
Defendant: U.S. PROBATION OFFICE, KAREN K. CALDWEL, TANYA WALTON PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
NDZERRE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2017cv00090
Plaintiff: HABAKUK NDZERRE
Defendant: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
PORUP v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2017cv00072
Defendant: CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Plaintiff: JENS PORUP
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
HCA-HEALTHONE LLC v. BURWELL
as 1:2017cv00073
Plaintiff: HCA-HEALTHONE LLC
Defendant: SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2017cv00082
Plaintiff: JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER , OCEAN MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant: SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
EMRIT v. HECK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00095
Plaintiff: RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant: JOE HECK
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff: RIVERVIEW MEDICAL CENTER , OCEAN MEDICAL CENTER , JERSEY SHORE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: SYLVIA M. BURWELL
Cause Of Action: HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?