US District Court for the Middle District of Florida Civil Rights Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 21,471
Larrazabal v. Centerwell Health Services (USA), LLC
as 6:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Michael Larrazabal
Defendant:
Centerwell Health Services (USA), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gomez v. Kaur et al
as 8:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
Sudeep Kaur, NYS Child Support Processing Center and Silbana Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Epperson v. The Hertz Corporation
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Steven Epperson
Defendant:
The Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hill v. Lee County Plumbing and Well Service
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HILL
Defendant:
LEE COUNTY PLUMBING AND WELL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
King v. Lee County et al
as 2:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tammy King
Defendant:
LEE COUNTY, a Florida political subdivision, Sheriff Carmine Marceno, Deputy Sheriff Jay Brett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
