US District Court for the Middle District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 8,592
Pringle v. Duncan
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
James I Pringle
Defendant:
T. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Vadol Reed and Vadol M. Reed
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USP Coleman II
as 5:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Raynard Davis
Defendant:
USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pringle v. Duncan
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
James I Pringle
Defendant:
T. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lakeland Police Department
as 8:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Terrance T. Williams
Defendant:
Lakeland Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christ v. Lakeland Police Department et al
as 8:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Randy Lewis Edward Christ
Defendant:
Lakeland Police Department and Nicholas Buttrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Eckhart et al
as 3:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Mark Eugene Hatcher
Defendant:
Michael Eckhart and Peter Zenuti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. The Haven
as 8:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Shaffer
Defendant:
The Haven
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adkins v. Charlotte C.I. et al
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McClellen Adkins
Defendant:
Charlotte C.I., Dr. Noe, Centurion Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Hendry County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Rodney Nigel Phillips, Jr.
Defendant:
Hendry County Jail, Officer Jones, Officer Croswell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
